Last Land treats accessibility as part of product quality. We use WCAG 2.2 Level AA as a design and review target while improving public and product surfaces over time. This statement does not represent independent certification of every page or workflow.
If a public document is not usable in its current format, ask for a reasonable alternative through the contact route.
Design target
WCAG 2.2
Level AA as the working benchmark
Primary input
Keyboard
Core journeys should not require a pointer
Responsive content
Reflow
Readable across zoom and viewport changes
Improvement model
Ongoing
Review, feedback, remediation, verification
Current practices
These are the standards we expect new public work to follow and existing work to move toward.
Review cycle
01
Automated checks can find patterns, but they do not replace human review of real tasks.
02
A component is only accessible when its content, state, placement, and surrounding workflow are accessible too.
03
Feedback from a person encountering a barrier is evidence that should change the product backlog.
Known limitations
The site and connected products continue to evolve, and some content comes from systems we do not fully control.
Linked product sites, embedded media, external documents, and provider interfaces may have accessibility behavior outside Last Land's direct control. We still want reports about barriers at those handoff points.
A legacy image or downloadable file may not contain an equivalent text description or accessible document structure. Contact us for the information in another reasonable format.
New or substantially revised workflows may have defects that were not found before release. High-impact barriers in core tasks receive priority when reported.
Accessibility feedback
Share what prevented progress and the format or path that would work better. We will route it to the relevant owner and explain the next step we can take.